Defence

 National defence is a legitimate role of the Commonwealth government. However, unnecessary expenditure on defence contributes to excessive taxation.

History also shows that standing armies can be a threat to liberty, which led to the 1689 English Bill of Rights and Third Amendment to the US Constitution. Freedom is best served by limiting the size of the permanent military while being able to quickly expand it if required.

In addition, imposing limits on the ability of the government to engage in war can reduce the risk of military conflict for political advantage.

The security of Australia and its citizens is heavily dependent on goodwill with other countries. This can be promoted by active engagement, particularly through trade. Indeed, the prosperity and interdependence resulting from free trade is a key contributor to peace.

 Australia can never be entirely self-reliant in defence as it lacks the technological resources, manpower and financial capacity to protect itself against attack by a major power. However, it can deter aggression through defence alliances with countries that share its values, and by maintaining the ability to both resist and strike back.

The LDP recognises four types of threats to national security around which its national defence policy is based:

 1.    Regional small-scale conflicts or failed states that pose a moderate threat to Australia or its allies or have major humanitarian consequences;

 2.    Aggression by a medium or major power seeking to coerce the Australian government into modifying its policy on a specific issue - disputes over oil or fishing rights are possible examples;

3.    Invasion by a major power seeking to secure a permanent foothold in Australia; and

4.    Currently most significant, international terrorism by non-government forces.

 LDP Policy

  Use of The Military

 1.    The LDP does not believe Australia should involve itself militarily in another country unless authorised by the government of that country and by a prior vote comprising at least two-thirds majorities in both houses of federal parliament.

2.    The LDP recognises that international terrorist movements may have to be fought internationally, but believes the ADF should not be involved in the suppression of terrorist actions in other countries unless such actions are a direct threat to the security of Australia. Such involvement should be subject to authorization by a prior vote comprising at least two-thirds majorities in both houses of federal parliament.

3.    Australia may commit the ADF to UN operations including peacekeeping, subject to authorisation by a prior vote comprising at least two-thirds majorities in both houses of federal parliament.

4.    In rare cases Australia may commit the ADF to the relief of oppression in another country, subject to authorisation by a prior vote comprising at least two-thirds majorities in both houses of federal parliament.

5.    Domestically the LDP does not consider the enforcement of immigration laws or fishing zones, or intervention in aboriginal townships in the Northern Territory, to be appropriate tasks for the ADF except coincidentally to its principal activities.

6.    Terrorist acts should be classified as crimes and, when occurring on Australian territory, should not involve the ADF unless they involve foreign state sponsorship or the magnitude of the threat exceeds the capability of civil security forces. Such involvement must be authorised by cabinet and confirmed by a parliamentary resolution at the first available opportunity.

7.    The LDP accepts that the ADF should be available to help supply emergency aid in the event of natural or man-made disasters, within Australia or overseas, if required. However, authorisation should be by cabinet confirmed by a parliamentary resolution at the first available opportunity.

8.    The recent trend to use military forces as security aids to civil authorities (now the primary role envisioned for the Army Reserve) is a dangerous trend evoking the spectre of authoritarianism and is opposed by the LDP.

9.    The LDP opposes any use of the ADF in domestic political disputes including industrial action.

10.    The LDP would repeal the Crimes (Foreign Incursions and Recruitment) Act 1978, thus allowing Australians to voluntarily engage in efforts to overthrow authoritarian and oppressive regimes.

Promoting Peace

11.    The LDP would seek to lessen the risk of conflict by promoting free trade (including unilateral removal of trade barriers) and diplomatic engagement. The LDP also supports professional diplomatic engagement together with trade representation (funded on a user-pays basis) to foster bilateral trade.

12.    The LDP supports the current alliance with the United States and recognises that it is integral to deterring major power aggression. However, it also recognises that the US has alliances with many countries and its assistance in the event of conflict cannot always be assured.

Military Service

 13.    The LDP is unequivocally opposed to compulsory military service including preventing volunteers leaving the services when their term of enlistment has expired. The LDP believes that if the citizens of a state choose not to volunteer to defend it, that state does not deserve to be defended.

14.    The LDP supports the establishment of military cadet units and similar arrangements in schools as a means of encouraging and normalising interest in voluntary military service, as long as no school is permitted to make such service either directly or indirectly compulsory.

Military Capability

 15.    The LDP believes Australia can achieve a far greater degree of defence preparedness than at present, at a significantly reduced cost to taxpayers.

16.    The LDP supports a military based on a core of full-time professionals complemented by an extensive voluntary reserve, with men and women viewing part time military service as beneficial to both themselves and the country.

17.    Consistent with similar provisions in the 2009 White Paper, the LDP would concentrate resources into key areas in support of a maritime defence strategy.

18.    The LDP believes the focus of our full-time military should be on the three strategic capabilities able to achieve long distance force projection. These comprise a strategic bomber capability, an effective submarine fleet, and a rapid reaction, air-mobile expeditionary force including Special Forces.

19.    Concurrently, the LDP believes that primary responsibility for the defence of Australia’s landmass should be transferred to a part-time force.

20.    To achieve this the LDP supports proceeding with the F35 fighter purchase but would also replace the F-111 fleet with a squadron of B-1B strategic bombers, paid for in part by a reduction in our order of F-35s.

21.    The LDP would replace the current six-boat Collins Class submarine fleet with a greater number of new submarines. Ideally this would be twelve small nuclear submarines (similar to the French Rubis design), but if these are not procurable or affordable then eighteen submarines with air independent conventional propulsion equipped with land attack cruise missiles.

This would be paid for in part by selling off most of the surface fleet (which, without a carrier, would be sunk at the beginning of any major war anyway) and retaining only a coastguard, including current Armidale Class patrol boats and three of the ANZAC Class frigates.

22.    The LDP would move away from reliance on a professional standing army towards a reserve that cycles in and out of active service. Most of the full-time Army would be disbanded, retaining only Special Forces, Intelligence, a reduced Training Command and essential staff needed for the part-time forces.

23.    The part-time Citizens Military Force would be re-created as the principal pillar of our national land defence organization, based on the core of the current Active Army Reserve.

24.    Service in the CMF would be promoted with major incentives including generous tax credits for days served and for employers who allow CMF members to take time off to train.

25.    Service in the CMF would involve short periods of full time training rather than weekend involvement, with most units sufficiently well organised and trained to require only limited preparation for active service.

26.    The CMF would be predominantly organized around communities with the aim of making voluntary CMF service to defend your local area a natural part of everyday community life. (In this respect the Swiss model is very relevant.) Some specialist technical units would also be required. 

27.    The LDP believes considerable savings can be achieved by greater involvement of the private sector in competing to supply goods and services to the ADF.

28.    A combined-arms, air deployable Australian International Brigade of mainly foreign volunteers with Australian Officers (along the lines of the French Foreign Legion or Ghurkas) would be created for use as an expeditionary army against international conventional and asymmetric military threats. (Proposed to comprise three mechanized infantry battalions, one armoured regiment, one self-propelled artillery regiment and one aviation regiment of attack helicopters, tactical ground attack aircraft and transport helicopters, all with the latest equipment and fully air transportable with its own fleet of C-17 Globemaster transports and C-130s).

29.    This Australian International Brigade would be fully self-funded by hiring its services to friendly countries and the UN for military duties in accord with Australian foreign policy.

30.    The LDP does not support the necessity of a government supported domestic defence industry. Defence procurement should be based on buying the items best suited to the defence tasks required, from the most competitive suppliers in Australia or overseas. However, the LDP does recognise the need for strategic stockpiling of war materiel to insure against hostilities disrupting foreign supplies.

31.    The LDP supports the maintenance of a nuclear reactor and nuclear expertise.

Discussion

 Recent years have seen the role for the ADF envisioned by successive Liberal and Labor governments drastically change. As the surrogate conflicts of the Cold War and the threat of major conventional and nuclear conflict has receded, the void has been filled by an exponential increase in military operations other than conventional war (MOOCW Ops).

As a result, both at home and abroad, the traditional role of the ADF to prepare to fight the armies of hostile states has given way to preparing primarily for a paramilitary transnational policing role.

The LDP is concerned at the effects of this shift in the use of the ADF, which at best raises the prospect of endless increases in defence costs requiring higher and higher taxes and at worst raises the spectre of a police state.

The LDP’s Defence Policy has been framed in response to these concerns, and seeks to balance the need for a capable ADF with limited military expenditure by re-focusing our defence priorities back to military concerns and by re-aligning our defence assets towards achieving significant strategic capabilities.

In this way, alone amongst other Australian political parties, the LDP’s Defence Policy is a plan to allow the ADF to punch well above its weight at a significantly lower cost to the taxpayer.